Back to playbooks

Scoreboard Template (Owner + Metric + Follow-Up)

Community | template | Updated 2026-02-28

Tags

playbook, template, scoreboard

Scoreboard Template (Owner + Metric + Follow-Up)

Use this when you want to keep an ask real.

If there is no owner, no metric, and no follow-up date, it is probably not a plan yet.

This template is meant to be boring on purpose. That is a feature.

When to use it

Use this after you already know:

  • the bottleneck
  • the one ask
  • the person or institution that can move it

This is the thing you update after the meeting, email, call, or comment period.

Scoreboard card

1) Issue

  • Topic:
  • Place:
  • Why this matters in one sentence:

2) One ask

  • Ask:
  • What should happen:
  • By when:

3) Owner

  • Main decider:
  • Staff owner (if known):
  • Backup / oversight body:

4) Metric

  • Main metric:
  • Baseline (if known):
  • Target:
  • Reporting rhythm: weekly / monthly / quarterly

5) Data source

  • Where the number comes from:
  • Public link or document:
  • Who can verify it:

6) Watchout

  • Likely loophole:
  • How they might dodge the ask:
  • What we will watch for:

7) Follow-up

  • Next date to check:
  • Next action if there is no movement:
  • Who owns the follow-up:

Example (filled in)

Issue

  • Topic: hospital prior-auth delays
  • Place: county / regional health systems
  • Why this matters in one sentence: treatment delays can quietly become denials

One ask

  • Ask: publish prior-auth denial and overturn rates by payer every quarter
  • What should happen: public reporting starts this year
  • By when: next quarter

Owner

  • Main decider: state insurance regulator
  • Staff owner: policy lead / data team
  • Backup / oversight body: health committee or attorney general

Metric

  • Main metric: denial rate and overturn rate by payer
  • Baseline: unknown / not published
  • Target: quarterly reporting, then lower denial volume over time
  • Reporting rhythm: quarterly

Data source

  • Where the number comes from: payer reporting + regulator publication
  • Public link or document: regulator dashboard / filing
  • Who can verify it: regulator, press, advocates, clinicians

Watchout

  • Likely loophole: publish incomplete data or collapse categories so the pattern disappears
  • How they might dodge the ask: “we need more study”
  • What we will watch for: missing categories, delayed releases, unhelpful rollups

Follow-up

  • Next date to check: 30 days after meeting
  • Next action if there is no movement: send follow-up email and raise at next public meeting
  • Who owns the follow-up: [name]

Keep it tight

You do not need ten metrics. You need one main metric, one owner, and one next check-in.

If the scoreboard gets too fancy, people stop using it.

Back to playbooks