Back to levers

Tags: Levers | Energy | Infrastructure | Resilience

Grid resilience and distributed power

North star: mesh + islands

1) What’s happening

The U.S. power system is a three-layer machine:

• bulk generation
• high-voltage transmission
• local distribution

It was built for “power flows one way” and “big stuff fails rarely.”

Now we’re in a world where:

• extreme weather is routine
• cybersecurity is a constant
• demand is rising (data centers, electrification)
• small-scale generation + storage is getting cheap and common

So the old design assumptions are breaking.

2) The simple model (plain language)

Resilience isn’t “centralized vs distributed.”

Resilience is: many paths instead of single paths.

A resilient grid needs both:

1. a strong backbone that can reroute power when something breaks (the mesh)
2. local resources that can keep critical loads alive and smooth peaks (the islands)

Think of it like roads + neighborhoods:

• highways move lots of people far
• side streets keep local life moving when a bridge is out
• you want both, and you want detours

3) What the U.S. looks like now (why it feels fragile)

The load-bearing weaknesses

• Transmission bottlenecks: we can’t move power where it’s needed fast enough.
• Interconnection queue hell: connecting new generation (and storage) is slow and expensive.
• Distribution upgrades lag: feeders and transformers weren’t designed for two-way flows.
• Utility incentives don’t match outcomes: many utilities earn more by building big capex, not by orchestrating customer-side flexibility.
• Governance fragmentation: state rules, federal rules, different utilities, different markets. Hard to scale anything uniformly.
• Single points of failure still exist: key substations, corridors, and control systems can take out large areas.

The current coping pattern

We often “solve” reliability by:

• building peaker plants
• overbuilding capacity
• throwing money at emergency response

That can keep lights on, but it’s expensive and it keeps customers powerless.

4) North star (what good looks like)

A grid that’s:

• hard to knock over
• fast to recover
• cheap to run
• fair to access

Call it:

Mesh + islands

• Mesh: modern transmission backbone with enough transfer capacity to route around failures and access lowest-cost power.
• Islands: lots of microgrids + virtual power plants so critical loads and communities can ride through outages and reduce peaks.

In E4E terms:

• security: fewer catastrophic outages, fewer price spikes
• choice: customers can generate/store/shift and get paid fairly
• competition: more supply can connect and compete
• shared gains: savings show up as lower long-run system costs, not just utility rate base
• more security: repeat

5) The toolbelt (what “distributed” actually means)

Distributed energy resources (DERs) = small things, coordinated well:

• rooftop solar
• community solar
• batteries (home, business, utility-scale at distribution)
• EV charging (and eventually EVs as flexible load / storage)
• smart thermostats and HVAC
• water heaters (huge hidden battery)
• backup generators (with guardrails on emissions and runtime)
• demand response (pay people to reduce load when it matters)

Two “systems glue” concepts matter:

Microgrids

A microgrid can run connected to the larger grid, then “island” during an outage.

Best targets:

• hospitals and clinics
• water and wastewater
• emergency shelters / resilience hubs
• grocery cold storage
• telecom sites
• key community centers

Virtual power plants (VPPs)

A VPP is many small devices that act like one power plant.

It’s the fastest way to scale “distributed” without requiring everyone to install rooftop solar.

6) Guardrails (non-negotiables)

Distributed power can become a new inequality machine if we’re not careful.

Equity

• renters must be able to participate (community solar, behind-the-meter batteries at multifamily, VPP enrollment through landlords or programs)
• low-income households must get first-class incentives and protections
• no “rich people get resilience, everyone else gets outages” outcome

Cybersecurity and safety

• device standards and update policies (no “internet toaster botnet” controlling the grid)
• clear responsibility lines: who can control what, when, and how it’s audited
• fail-safe defaults: loss of comms should not create unsafe behavior

Interoperability

• avoid vendor lock-in
• require open standards / portable enrollment
• make it easy to switch aggregators or programs without bricking devices

Cost allocation fairness

• transmission and distribution upgrades should not become a stealth regressive tax
• if large new loads (data centers, crypto, heavy industry) drive upgrades, they should pay an appropriate share

7) Transition plan (what it looks like in practice)

This is not a single “big switch.” It’s staged.

Stage 1: Stop the bleeding (0–2 years)

Goal: reduce outage pain and peak-cost spikes fast.

• Map and harden critical substations and corridors.
• Build microgrids for critical facilities first (water, shelters, clinics).
• Stand up a VPP program that’s simple:
  • easy opt-in
  • clear payments
  • strong consumer protections
  • includes renters
• Fix the interconnection process locally where possible:
  • transparent timelines
  • predictable upgrade costs
  • standard contracts

Stage 2: Make distributed a real grid asset (2–5 years)

Goal: turn “random devices” into dispatchable flexibility.

• Deploy DERMS / orchestration tools at utilities and ISOs (with guardrails).
• Shift rate design away from punishing participation:
  • avoid export bans as a blunt instrument
  • avoid “gotcha” fees that kill adoption
• Expand community solar + storage.
• Use non-wires alternatives:
  • pay DERs to solve local congestion instead of only building new wires

Stage 3: Build the backbone (5–15 years)

Goal: cheap power + strong reliability at scale.

• Build transmission like it’s national infrastructure.
• Increase inter-regional transfer capacity (more sharing, fewer islands forced by politics).
• Standardize markets for flexibility so VPPs can bid everywhere.
• Integrate EVs as flexible load (and eventually storage), without making it a reliability hazard.

8) Scoreboard (measure what matters)

If we can’t measure it, it becomes vibes.

Reliability

• SAIDI / SAIFI (outage minutes and outage frequency)
• major outage events per year (and restoration time)
• critical facility coverage:
  • % of water/wastewater plants with islandable backup
  • % of designated resilience hubs with islandable backup

Build velocity

• median interconnection timeline for:
  • small solar
  • storage
  • community solar
  • utility-scale generation
• queue size and churn rate (projects entering vs exiting)
• time-to-permit for:
  • distribution upgrades
  • transmission projects

Affordability

• peak price events per year (and magnitude)
• congestion costs (where available)
• household bill volatility (month-to-month swings)
• share of system cost spent on peakers and emergency measures

Participation and fairness

• VPP enrollment:
  • total MW available
  • % renters / multifamily participation
  • % low-income participation
• community solar subscriptions by income bracket (where data exists)
• percentage of customers offered at least one “get paid for flexibility” option

Security and safety

• number of critical cyber incidents disclosed (trend)
• compliance with device standards (coverage %)
• audit findings for aggregator / utility control programs

9) How to talk about it (bridge language)

• “This isn’t ‘centralized vs distributed.’ It’s ‘fragile vs resilient.’”
• “We need a strong backbone and local backup. Highways and side streets.”
• “People don’t want energy ideology. They want the lights on and bills that make sense.”
• “Distributed power should not be a luxury good. Renters should benefit too.”

10) One-page civic asks (copy/paste)

Pick one lane and push it consistently.

Ask A: Critical facilities first

“Publish a list of critical facilities and a 3-year plan to add islandable backup power for each one.”

Ask B: VPP for everyone

“Create a VPP program that includes renters and pays customers for peak support, with simple enrollment and strong protections.”

Ask C: Interconnection transparency

“Publish interconnection timelines, costs, and queue status in a public dashboard. Make delays explainable and appealable.”

Ask D: Cost allocation fairness

“If new large loads drive upgrades, require transparent cost-sharing so households aren’t quietly subsidizing private growth.”

11) Open questions / research stubs

Use these to drive future notes, posts, and interviews.

• Where are the real single points of failure (substations, corridors, control systems) in my region?
• What share of outages are transmission vs distribution vs generation?
• What are the current rules for:
  • net metering / export
  • storage interconnection
  • community solar
  • aggregator access (VPP participation)
• What’s the local utility incentive structure (how do they earn)?
• Who can approve or block transmission and distribution upgrades (veto points)?
• What are the best “resilience hub” microgrid case studies and financing models?
• What’s the best renter-friendly package:
  • community solar + bill credits
  • shared storage
  • appliance incentives tied to VPP enrollment

12) Notes for E4E framing

This is a monthly squeeze issue.

• Outages are a direct cost (spoiled food, missed work, hotel nights, repairs).
• Price spikes and congestion costs show up in bills.
• Resilience is household security, not a luxury.

The “loop” version:

• insecurity (outages + volatile bills) -> fear + blame -> no durable fixes -> more insecurity

The “north star” loop:

• security -> choice -> competition -> shared gains -> more security

Back to levers