Back to levers

Tags: Levers | Energy | Infrastructure | Resilience

Grid resilience and distributed power

North star: mesh + islands

1) What’s happening

The U.S. power system is a three-layer machine:

• bulk generation
• high-voltage transmission
• local distribution

It was built for “power flows one way” and “big stuff fails rarely.”

Now we’re in a world where:

• extreme weather is routine
• cybersecurity is a constant
• demand is rising (data centers, electrification)
• small-scale generation + storage is getting cheap and common

So the old design assumptions are breaking.

2) The simple model (plain language)

The useful split is fragile vs resilient, not centralized vs distributed.

Resilience means many paths, not one fragile path.

A resilient grid needs both:

1. a strong backbone that can reroute power when something breaks (the mesh)
2. local resources that can keep critical loads alive and smooth peaks (the islands)

Think of it like roads + neighborhoods:

• highways move lots of people far
• side streets keep local life moving when a bridge is out
• you want both, and you want detours

3) What the U.S. looks like now (why it feels fragile)

The load-bearing weaknesses

• Transmission bottlenecks: we can’t move power where it’s needed fast enough.
• Interconnection queue hell: connecting new generation (and storage) is slow and expensive.
• Distribution upgrades lag: feeders and transformers weren’t designed for two-way flows.
• Utility incentives don’t match outcomes: many utilities earn more by building big capex, not by orchestrating customer-side flexibility.
• Governance fragmentation: state rules, federal rules, different utilities, different markets. Hard to scale anything uniformly.
• Single points of failure still exist: key substations, corridors, and control systems can take out large areas.

The current coping pattern

We often “solve” reliability by:

• building peaker plants
• overbuilding capacity
• throwing money at emergency response

That can keep lights on, but it’s expensive and it keeps customers powerless.

4) North star (what good looks like)

A grid that’s:

• hard to knock over
• fast to recover
• cheap to run
• fair to access

Call it:

Mesh + islands

• Mesh: modern transmission backbone with enough transfer capacity to route around failures and access lowest-cost power.
• Islands: lots of microgrids + virtual power plants so critical loads and communities can ride through outages and reduce peaks.

In E4E terms:

• security: fewer catastrophic outages, fewer price spikes
• choice: customers can generate/store/shift and get paid fairly
• competition: more supply can connect and compete
• shared gains: savings show up as lower long-run system costs for households
• more security: repeat

5) The toolbelt (what “distributed” means in practice)

Distributed energy resources (DERs) = small things, coordinated well:

• rooftop solar
• community solar
• batteries (home, business, utility-scale at distribution)
• EV charging (and eventually EVs as flexible load / storage)
• smart thermostats and HVAC
• water heaters (huge hidden battery)
• backup generators (with guardrails on emissions and runtime)
• demand response (pay people to reduce load when it matters)

Two “systems glue” concepts matter:

Microgrids

A microgrid can run connected to the larger grid, then “island” during an outage.

Best targets:

• hospitals and clinics
• water and wastewater
• emergency shelters / resilience hubs
• grocery cold storage
• telecom sites
• key community centers

Virtual power plants (VPPs)

A VPP is many small devices that act like one power plant.

It’s the fastest way to scale “distributed” without requiring everyone to install rooftop solar.

6) Guardrails (non-negotiables)

Distributed power can become a new inequality machine if we’re not careful.

Equity

• renters must be able to participate (community solar, behind-the-meter batteries at multifamily, VPP enrollment through landlords or programs)
• low-income households must get first-class incentives and protections
• no “rich people get resilience, everyone else gets outages” outcome

Cybersecurity and safety

• device standards and update policies (no “internet toaster botnet” controlling the grid)
• clear responsibility lines: who can control what, when, and how it’s audited
• fail-safe defaults: loss of comms should not create unsafe behavior

Interoperability

• avoid vendor lock-in
• require open standards / portable enrollment
• make it easy to switch aggregators or programs without bricking devices

Cost allocation fairness

• transmission and distribution upgrades should not become a stealth regressive tax
• if large new loads (data centers, crypto, heavy industry) drive upgrades, they should pay an appropriate share

7) Transition plan (what it looks like in practice)

The transition happens in stages.

Stage 1: Stop the bleeding (0-2 years)

Goal: reduce outage pain and peak-cost spikes fast.

• Map and harden critical substations and corridors.
• Build microgrids for critical facilities first (water, shelters, clinics).
• Stand up a VPP program that’s simple:
  • easy opt-in
  • clear payments
  • strong consumer protections
  • includes renters
• Fix the interconnection process locally where possible:
  • transparent timelines
  • predictable upgrade costs
  • standard contracts

Stage 2: Make distributed a dispatchable grid asset (2-5 years)

Goal: turn “random devices” into dispatchable flexibility.

• Deploy DERMS / orchestration tools at utilities and ISOs (with guardrails).
• Shift rate design away from punishing participation:
  • avoid export bans as a blunt instrument
  • avoid “gotcha” fees that kill adoption
• Expand community solar + storage.
• Use non-wires alternatives:
  • pay DERs to solve local congestion before defaulting to new wires

Stage 3: Build the backbone (5-15 years)

Goal: cheap power + strong reliability at scale.

• Build transmission like it’s national infrastructure.
• Increase inter-regional transfer capacity (more sharing, fewer islands forced by politics).
• Standardize markets for flexibility so VPPs can bid everywhere.
• Integrate EVs as flexible load (and eventually storage), without making it a reliability hazard.

8) Scoreboard (measure what matters)

If we can’t measure it, it becomes vibes.

Reliability

• SAIDI / SAIFI (outage minutes and outage frequency)
• major outage events per year (and restoration time)
• critical facility coverage:
  • % of water/wastewater plants with islandable backup
  • % of designated resilience hubs with islandable backup

Build velocity

• median interconnection timeline for:
  • small solar
  • storage
  • community solar
  • utility-scale generation
• queue size and churn rate (projects entering vs exiting)
• time-to-permit for:
  • distribution upgrades
  • transmission projects

Affordability

• peak price events per year (and magnitude)
• congestion costs (where available)
• household bill volatility (month-to-month swings)
• share of system cost spent on peakers and emergency measures

Participation and fairness

• VPP enrollment:
  • total MW available
  • % renters / multifamily participation
  • % low-income participation
• community solar subscriptions by income bracket (where data exists)
• percentage of customers offered at least one “get paid for flexibility” option

Security and safety

• number of critical cyber incidents disclosed (trend)
• compliance with device standards (coverage %)
• audit findings for aggregator / utility control programs

9) How to talk about it (bridge language)

• “The useful split is fragile vs resilient, not centralized vs distributed.”
• “We need a strong backbone and local backup. Highways and side streets.”
• “People don’t want energy ideology. They want the lights on and bills that make sense.”
• “Distributed power should be available to renters too.”

10) One-page civic asks (copy/paste)

Pick one lane and push it consistently.

Ask A: Critical facilities first

“Publish a list of critical facilities and a 3-year plan to add islandable backup power for each one.”

Ask B: VPP for everyone

“Create a VPP program that includes renters and pays customers for peak support, with simple enrollment and strong protections.”

Ask C: Interconnection transparency

“Publish interconnection timelines, costs, and queue status in a public dashboard. Make delays explainable and appealable.”

Ask D: Cost allocation fairness

“If new large loads drive upgrades, require transparent cost-sharing so households aren’t quietly subsidizing private growth.”

11) Open questions / research stubs

Use these to drive future notes, posts, and interviews.

• Where are the most dangerous single points of failure (substations, corridors, control systems) in my region?
• What share of outages are transmission vs distribution vs generation?
• What are the current rules for:
  • net metering / export
  • storage interconnection
  • community solar
  • aggregator access (VPP participation)
• What’s the local utility incentive structure (how do they earn)?
• Who can approve or block transmission and distribution upgrades (veto points)?
• What are the best “resilience hub” microgrid case studies and financing models?
• What’s the best renter-friendly package:
  • community solar + bill credits
  • shared storage
  • appliance incentives tied to VPP enrollment

12) Notes for E4E framing

This is a monthly squeeze issue.

• Outages are a direct cost (spoiled food, missed work, hotel nights, repairs).
• Price spikes and congestion costs show up in bills.
• Resilience is household security.

The “loop” version:

• insecurity (outages + volatile bills) -> fear + blame -> no durable fixes -> more insecurity

The “north star” loop:

• security -> choice -> competition -> shared gains -> more security

Back to levers